Saturday, April 27, 2019

An Addendum and Update on the State of Toy Soldier Collecting

This author personally believes that a significant evolution has occurred in the collecting of toy soldiers. As has been previously and frequently stated in this blog at least two major factors have been driving the collection of toy soldiers/military miniatures for at least several decades. I personally feel that for the serious collector, regardless of their resources or perspective of interest, there has been an evolution from the classic toy soldier to the military miniature, i.e. from vintage Minot and W. Britains Ltd to King & Country, Thomas Gunn and John Jenkins, just as examples. Strongly illustrative of this trend is the decrease of auctions of vintage toy soldiers (W. Britains) in both the United States and Great Britain, and the overall diminished presence and quality of the sets being offered on e-Bay. Further corroborating this fact is the significant overall decrease of prices realized at auction in recent years, again with exceptions. If one views recent photographs at the decreasing number of remaining toy soldier shows (West Coaster and Texas are gone, and in the U.K. the shows are much smaller) the discernible absence of the iconic shiny red W. Britains boxes is consistent. The notable exceptions (there are always exceptions) being William Hocker and Imperial (New Zealand). Hocker more so than Imperial, providing a nostalgic bridge to the past, including the shiny red boxes.



My personal opinion is that the increase in scale, 1:32 (54mm) to 1:30 (~60mm), and the resultant significant increase in detail, quality of figure sculpture and painting (and in most cases historical accuracy), and the predomination of matte over gloss finish, have been the principal results. Obviously as this has occurred, and with the overall world skilled labour market, prices have sharply increased in recent years. I can clearly recall a previous parallel example. In the late 1940's to the mid 50's a box/set (8 infantry or 5 cavalry) of W. Britains Ltd. cost between $1.25 to $2.00 USD, but even then, a single Greenwood & Ball figure was priced from $6.50 to $9.50 USD, at the time at least for me, an exorbitant cost. 

The second factor of this evolution being the trend from merely display of mass formations to dioramas, has caused a change in the resultant facets of judgement and appreciation of individual collections.  And again Malcom Forbes presentation format at his museum in Tangiers, Morocco and Anne Brown’s collection at the Brown University Library (see; https://library.brown.edu/collections/askb/) being significant exceptions.





The following is a photograph of the late Ed Ruby with a portion of his collection (in the previously classic format), considered by many, including James Opie, to be one of the world's consummate collectors of vintage W. Britains Ltd. toy soldiers. It is followed by two images of a portion of the author's collection.  The first being in the older traditional format, and the second in an attempt at a semi-diorama format.




Until recently dioramas were predominately the domain of museums. Once again, the exceptions being individual “objects de art” and/or vignettes. Here artists in the Russian Federation, such as Aeroart of St. Petersburg and Attica Miniatures would appear to currently predominate the field, as seen in the following images. It is extremely difficult to comprehend that these amazing figures are 1:32 (54mm) scale.





Not unlike the media of more classic and conventional art (with the obvious exception of modern abstract art) and photography, the elements of composition, historical accuracy, visual effects, and unique subject matter/backgrounds are significant factors. In this author’s opinion this tends to relegate the figures to merely an element, albeit essential, of the artist’s palette/lens.





All that having been said there is absolutely nothing to be taken, inferred, or intended of a negative or derogatory nature by the discussion of this evolution, it is that, an evolution, which should be both recognized and appreciated. However, there is one disconcerting element in addition to the sharp price increases that is universal, and the decreased collector population at the shows, that being the almost absolute absence of younger aged collectors joining the ranks. Unfortunately this is entirely understandable (given the prices) with the exception being the millennials, where apparently there is a lack of interest for one reason or another.







There is a saying sometimes uttered to categorize collectors , that is "there are the out-patients and there are the committables". For those who might be of the latter category, the following three videos are from the twice yearly London Toy Soldier Show of 2018, and should at least partially appease you cravings. Apologies for the limited redundancy. This is one of the few remaining shows in the world where there still is a significant representation of the classic vintage W. Britains Ltd. toy soldiers (1893-1966), along with the firm's current production line.




Monday, February 25, 2019

Royal Naval Air Service Armoured Car Section/Division Collar Badge - A Semi-Forensic Analysis

Paralleling the popularity of collecting the six battalion cap badges of the World War I Royal Naval Division is collecting the affiliated insignia of the Royal Naval Air Service Armoured Car Section, which was soon expanded into a Division. This principally consists of the collar badge (“dog”), with limited variants, which are frequently mistaken and referred to as a cap badge.

As is the case with the battalion cap badges, the collar dogs have provided fertile ground for unscrupulous entrepreneurs to exploit the demand provided by beginning, as well as even advanced collectors, who have not conducted in-depth research or obtained specimens with impeccable provenance.

In assessing the authenticity of a genuine collar dog look for the following details.
• In the copy the letter “R” in RNAS is very close, if not almost touching the left hand edge of the armored car’s turret. In the originals there is a space.
• In the copy the dimpling on the front surface area of the badge is very pronounced, if not almost rough. In the originals this surface is smoother to both the touch and appearance.
• On the originals the lugs are consistently spaced, directly above the wheels and level with the top of car’s body.
• Of the originals there are apparently two types, one with voided crown, one non-voided crown, with a slight variance in size and weight:
Voided 49.32mm x 40.48mm and 52.85 g
Non voided 48.38mm x 41.72mm and 53.05 g
A smaller size original also exists with a variance in dimensions:
One being 25mm wide x 30mm tall.
The other cited as an o/r collar, being 17.07mm x 30.55mm.
 • Depending on the manufacturer’s dies there is another variance in the originals of two types; termed by some collectors as a 'Low' bonnet & tray and a 'High' bonnet & tray. As best determined this refers to the depth and curvature shown on the reverse side. Copies tend to have the high characteristic. 
• Copies tend to have thin/skinny lettering, and poor definition in the crown and jewel detail.
• Originals all have lugs, not sliders.
• Originals have a rich dark matte finish in a range of shades, but certainly not a shiny or brassy appearance.   

Again, as is typically the case, best assurance is well established provenance.

The following three badges are classic counterfeits, because of several of the above cited details.








Based upon the same set of authenticating criteria the following badges have a high probability of being original and genuine.













The following badge is a known genuine variant, probable officer's collar dog.



The following image not only shows the badges being wore, but it also shows the man on the left wearing the distinctive ammunition pouch issued with the Webley Scott .455cal. Self-loading Pistol MkI Model 1912. Note the absence of the set of cartridge loops on the flap and the squarer shape of the pouch compared with the man on the right. See; http://arnhemjim.blogspot.com/2016/05/tell-it-to-marines.html for details.


Another image showing a group of officers of the R.N.A.S. Armoured Car Section/Division wearing both types of collar insignia.


Thursday, February 21, 2019

1st Canadian Armored Carrier Regiment Cap Badge - A Semi-Forensic Study

As would be expected due to the uniqueness of the unit, its small size, and its short span of existence, the cap badge (as well as the collar devices) of the 1stCanadian Armored Carrier Regiment (1 CACR) have fallen victim to replicater’s skills.

The first image is a side-by-side comparison of a genuine badge on the left and a reproduction on the right, as well as showing both the front and rear of the badge. The originals are lugged with the orientation being N-S.



Another very clear set of images of a counterfeit badge, which recently sold for $550.00 USD.






W.J. Miller of the British and Commonwealth Military Badge Forum has recently provided an excellent analysis comparing one of the original WWII badges to what he diplomatically defines as a “post-war badge”, i.e.,counterfeit/fake. His analysis is herein acknowledged and gratitude extended for its use. The badge was manufactured by J.R. Gaunt & Son of London, from a design originated by the regiment’s commanding officer. The presented image size is a compromise between clarity (resolution) and the physical size of the image.



A pair of what are to believed to be a correct/genuine pair of collar dogs for the regiment.