Tuesday, July 14, 2020

The Royal Navy Field Gun Trial an Annual Grueling Competition Steeped in Tradition

For those familiar with the Royal Navy, including the author who is a retired semi-skilled professional naval intelligence officer, it is known to be steeped in tradition. While admittedly a mere shadow of its two past zeniths, that being the end of World War I in 1918 and World War II in 1945, there are certain remaining traditions which still stir the souls of all sailors, and others throughout the world as well.

One tradition originated in 1907, which was unfortunately lost for a decade in 1999 due to shortsighted bureaucrats, was revived in 2009. It is the Royal Navy Field Gun Trial. It is a grueling, exciting, even freighting, literally finger shearing, bone breaking, race that annually commemorates a land action by the Royal Navy during the Second Boer War (Relief of Ladysmith, 1899 -1900), and certainly rivals, even exceeding, the running of the bulls at Pamplona.

Believe it or not it even has a toy soldier connection in that a relatively early set of W. Britains Ltd., toy soldiers, while not intentionally, still commemorates that original action. It is Set No.79, Royal Navy Landing Party with Limber and Gun, the first of three versions being issued in 1897, with the 3rd and last version being issued in 1952, and available up until 1966. As can be seen, the design of the toy replica gun even allows a similar disassembly paralleling the real guns used in the current competitions.


In the1990s there was also a British new toy soldier manufacturer of two partners, Mountford (David Love) -Tarrant (Peter Tarrant), who for a very short period produced a magnificent, accurate and complete 1:32 scale toy soldier replication of the event. I have been able to recover the files showing the figures, however unfortunately the images are very small, but do provide some idea of the scope and accuracy of the set. Particularly note the wheels and gun barrel compared with the simpler Britains first version (In all fairness Britains did increase the spokes from 8 to an accurate 12 in later versions). Saw some of the figures in The Guards Toy Soldier Centre (The Guards Museum) in London in 2006, but unfortunately priorities and resources intervened. 








While there is some historical confusion as to the exact configuration, and designation of the original guns, the author will defer to the official Royal Navy website which cites the gun as a “12 pounder field gun” (the correct nomenclature being, Ordnance, Quick Firing 12 pdr 12 cwt). The Britains set also incorporates a hand drawn limber very similar to the replica which is used in the current competition.

In order to alleviate some of the possible confusion, the four 12 pdrs in the Navy’s relief party were joined by two much larger Ordnance, Q.F. 4.7 inch Naval Guns (Mk I-IV) which had been removed from the Cape Town coastal defenses, and remounted on special improvised mobile carriages. These heavier pieces were drawn by teams of oxen. W. Britains also built several versions of this gun as Set No. 1264 4.7 in. Naval Gun (Mounted for Field Operations). For those who might be interested see; https://www.planetdiecast.com/index.php?&option=com_myblog&show=britain-47-inch-naval-gun-four-versionshtml&Itemid=157  .

The following are a series of images first showing the vintage gun and crew, a second current image of a restored gun posed in front of HMS Victory in Portsmouth Historical Dockyard, a third of one of the current competition crews manning their gun, and a fourth series of images showing the final version of the set of W. Britains toy soldiers.








For those readers who may be interested in a more extensive historical background of the competition the author recommends the following two web sites; https://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/our-organisation/bases-and-stations/training-establishments/hms-temeraire/rn-field-gun
https://www.navy.gov.au/customs-and-traditions/field-gun-run 

A relatively recent (2009) Daily Mail reporter's account of the competition and team training regimen can be found at; https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1179549/The-real-Top-Guns-Never-mind-health-safety--worlds-dangerous-sport--Royal-Navys-field-gun-race.html

Following are URLs of various past performances of the completion;




Saturday, July 11, 2020

A General Administrative Notice to All Followers and Readers of the Arnhem Jim Blog Page

Since the origination of the Arnhem Jim blog page in March of 2011 the author has tried to maintain reader/viewer interest by posting a diverse spectrum of articles on seemingly esoteric subject matter. Given that the blog recently passed 800,000 hits it appears to have been able to achieve that objective, and it is personally very rewarding. That is particularly true in this year 2020, and the international challenge posed by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Whether you are one of the 90 identified Followers, or a first time viewer of the blog, the author would like to take this opportunity to sincerely thank each and everyone of you personally for your interest and continuing support. Consistent with my gratitude, would like to covey my intent to maintain the blog as a living document, and continue to welcome general or specific comments and questions from all interested readers who may be inclined to comment.

I’m specifically very attentive to any errors brought to my attention, which are immediately corrected, with recognition and sincere gratitude being afforded to the “contributing editor”. 

Additionally it is realized that as most articles utilize a multi-media format, some of the URLs which are referenced in a single article, for a multiple of reasons, may not still be available or have moved. Periodically, unfortunately on albeit a random basis, the author tries to maintain the currency of referenced links. Also new additional relevant information from contributing viewers, new books, links, imagery, and other sources, are constantly being incorporated as revisions, corrections, or additions.

As only one person, what I am unable to accomplish is to provide notification to all readers of these refinements to each and every article when they occur. So if there is a specific subject and/or blog article of interest, this author would encourage you to periodically check the blog for any up-dates. At the beginning of all major subjects of established interest there hopefully is a cited most recent revision date. Unfortunately in the case of list of armaments, equipment, i.e. as they are referred to in military parlance, TO&Es, this effort has been inconsistent, so the reader should check. My apologies.

In closure the author would again like to express sincere gratitude to everyone, and continue to invite and encourage active participation in the Arnhem Jim blog. Please realize no question on any subject is considered too simple. An another continuing axiom which as a retired semi-skilled professional naval intelligence officer I try to rigorously adhere to, is the exclusion of the words ‘assume’ and ‘assumption’ from my vocabulary and research. 













And to reiterate:
A Scottish Regimental Toast (48th Highlanders of Canada; affiliated with the Gordon Highlanders)
Commanding Officer:
A Mhàidseir na pìoba, òlamaid deoch-slàinte!
(Pipe Major, let us drink a toast)
Pipe Major's reply:
A h-uile latha a chì 's nach fhaic, an dà fhicheadamh 's a h-ochd gu bràth! Slàinte
don Bhànrigh! Slàinte Mhòr! Slàinte!
(Every day that I see you, or that I don't see you, the 48th forever! Health to the Queen!
Great good health! Health!)

Thursday, May 28, 2020

When is a ‘HARP’ not a Refinance of Your Home or Even a Musical Instrument?

To the vast majority of people in the United States who may know, and have taken advantage of the program, the acronym HARP (Homeowner’s Affordable Refinance Program) is just that, initiated and administered under the auspices of the federal government.

However, to a small, and very rapidly dwindling group of select people, HARP was the acronym for Honeywell Advanced Research Program(s), a broad cover for a series of ‘black programs’ conducted under highly classified contracts with certain agencies of the federal government in the 1970s. Honeywell’s effort was conducted by personnel of the Marine Systems Center in Seattle, Washington, with assistance from the Training and Control Systems Center in West Covina, California (near NOTS Pasadena).

In another actual “Forest Gump” type experience this author had reasonable knowledge of one of those programs, and the unique opportunity to actually work on one of the other programs. The first program went under the cover name Project “Jennifer” (the real project name now known to be “Azorian”). It was conducted by the Central Intelligence Agency, the Summa Corporation, Lockheed Missile and Space Systems Corp., Sun Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co., and several other civilian contractors (including Honeywell MSC) , in the early to mid 1970’s. Employing the purpose built ‘Glomar Explorer’ and associated barge, it involved raising the sunken Soviet Navy Golf II Class SSG missile submarine K-129 (a portion thereof) from a depth of more than 3 miles off the floor of the Pacific Ocean near Hawaii.

If the reader is interested, the author has previously related another "Forest Gump" moment, related to naval intelligence in blog post: https://arnhemjim.blogspot.com/2018/06/a-forrest-gump-type-moment-in-naval.html

Still have and treasure, one of the manganese nodules “mined” by the Glomar Explorer, as a memento from its cover story, and given to me by the late C. Richard Abbey, Honeywell HARP Program Manager, and dear friend.

One of the, if not the main, contribution to the program made by Honeywell, was the engineering design, manufacture, installation, operation, and logistical support of a long baseline dynamic station-keeping system. The system employed a single acoustic transmitter/receiver on ship hull's bottom and an array of acoustic transponders on the ocean bottom.This was in turn, computer integrated with the bow and stern thrusters of the ship, providing continuous position accuracy of the ship over a bottom target, which could be maintained within a real time CEP of less than ten feet. This to a depth of nearly 17,000 feet (3.2 miles) where the submarine lay, within a limited range of sea states. The Project Engineer for this system was Hal Clark. Honeywell was also contracted to support the design and development of the giant claw's optical and acoustic sensor suite.

For comparative purposes:

Glomar Explorer
Displacement: 50,500 long tons
Length (overall): 619 ft (189 m)
Beam: 116 ft (35 m)
Draft: 38 ft

Iowa Class Battleship
Displacement: 47,825 long tons
Length (overall): 860 ft (262.1 m)
Beam:108 ft 2 in (33.0 m)
Draft: 37 ft 2 in (Full load)

The following three images show the Glomar Explorer, and the concept of its operation:





The principal reason for the ship's length and broad beam was to accommodate what was called the "moon bay", a massive interior cavern sized to house the entire capture claw with its payload, the submarine.

Although less than a great photograph, it shows participants in the formal signing ceremony for Summa Corporation's acceptance of the HGE (Hughes Glomar Explorer) from Global Marine on 21 July 1974. Dick Abbey is in front kneeliing (in white Shirt).The event took place on board the ship in international waters in order to avoid taxes, and more importantly the notoriety and recorded record of same.


For those readers who might want to read in detail about Project Azorian the following three books are highly recommended:
N. Polmar and M. White, Project AZORIAN The CIA and the Raising of the K-129, Annapolis, MD, Naval Institute Press, 2010, ISBN 978-1-59114-690-2
Sharp, D.H., THE CIA’S GREATEST COVERT OPERATION Inside the Daring Mission to Recover a Nuclear-Armed Soviet Sub, Lawrence, KS, University Press of Kansas, 2012, ISBN 978-0-7006-1834-7
J. Dean, The Taking of the K-129 How the CIA Used Howard Hughes to Steal a Russian Sub in the Most Daring Covert Operation in History, NY, DUTTON, 2017, ISBN 97811101984437

There is also an excellent DVD titled AZORIAN The Raising of the K-129, ISBN 978-1-60883-379-5  produced by Michael White.

The second program that the author was privileged to actually work on was Project "IVY BELLS" under contract with the U.S. Navy and the Central Intelligence Agency. I often comment, and only partially in jest, that if in that time frame the United States and the Soviet Union had come into open conflict, that I would have indirectly contributed to insuring that then Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union (equivalent to US Chief of Naval Operations) Sergei Gorshkov, and his staff, would have had the figurative equivalent of a garrote of piano-wire around their lower organs, resulting in  having "sung like the Vienna Boys’ Choir". 

The author was involved in conducting the mission and operations analyses, preparatory to the actual operations by the USS Halibut (SSGN-587), USS Parche (SSN-683), USS Richard B. Russell (SSN-687) and USS Seawolf (SSN-575), in the deploying of, and data recovery from a series of “Beasts” on the floor of the Sea of Okhotsk.

This author wishes to express both full acknowledgment and gratitude to the website Covert Shores; http://www.hisutton.com/ and its author H.I. Sutton, for the use of the following two images. For any reader who is interested in the subject, I cannot recommend a finer and more current website. Both images can be enlarged to a limited degree in order that the legends are more legible.  



Suffices to say that the program was highly compartmented on an extremely tight “need to know” basis. Will never forget one of our program reviews conducted in our “sciff” (SCIF - Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility) in Seattle, that the reviewing CIA agents (first names only, and I’m not sure those were real)) told Dick Abbey that I needed to be briefed into the next level of the program. He took me aside, and without any paper record he verbally said one word, ‘Petropavlosk’.That was it, and our meeting continued. The Soviet Navy’s communication cables were laid on the ocean floor of the Sea of  Okhotsk and  linked Soviet Pacific Naval HQ in Vladivostok with their major fleet naval base in Petropavlovsk.

The “Beast(s)” were appropriately nick-named. The author was never made privy to its actual name/nomenclature, and possibly for security purposes it never had one, other than a alphanumeric. Designed and constructed at AT&T Bell Labs it was 20 ft. long and weighed 6 tons. It had a plutonium 238 nuclear power source. It used the principle of electrical induction to record the clear (open un-coded) Russian language message traffic being transmitted without needing to physically penetrate the cable’s protective casing, thus technically in compliance with the provisions of International law.

Given Dick Abbey’s knowledge of electronics and acoustical engineering, I’m certain that he had made a significant hands-on contribution to the design effort. Certainly much more than just a token observer's role.

As a momentary complete segue, among his other talents was the fact that he was an expert long range rifle shot, having trained and served during the Korean war as a Marine with the MOS 8541(now 0317) of a designated Scout Sniper. He continued to compete in amateur matches well into his retirement. One of his favorite rifles was the U.S. Rifle, Springfield, Cal. .30-06, Model 1903A3. It had been his rifle in Korea. A gentleman of many and diverse talents.

With full attribution and expressed gratitude to Wikipedia the following excerpt is cited:

"The Okhotsk cable tapping operation continued for ten years, involving routine trips by three different specially equipped submarines to collect old pods and lay new ones; sometimes, more than one pod at a time. New targets were added in 1979. That summer, a newly converted submarine called USS Parche travelled from San Francisco under the North Pole to the Barents Sea, and laid a new cable tap near Murmansk. Its crew received a presidential citation for their achievement.

(Editorial note: I spent a very challenging, but rewarding, assignment with my family in Seattle for the entire summer of 1979, during one of the nicest summers the city had experienced.)

This operation was compromised by Ronald Pelton, a disgruntled 44-year-old veteran of the NSA, who was fluent in Russian. At the time, Pelton was $65,000 ($202,000 today) in debt, and had filed for personal bankruptcy just three months before he resigned. With only a few hundred dollars in the bank, Pelton walked into the Soviet embassy in Washington, D.C. in January 1980, and offered to sell what he knew to the KGB for money. 

No documents were passed from Pelton to the Soviets, as he had an extremely good memory: he reportedly received $35,000 from the KGB for the intelligence he provided from 1980 to 1983, and for the intelligence on the Operation Ivy Bells, the KGB gave him $5,000. The Soviets did not immediately take any action on this information; however, in 1981, surveillance satellites showed Soviet warships, including a salvage vessel, anchored over the site of the tap in the Sea of Okhotsk. USS Parche (SSN-683) was dispatched to recover the device, but the American divers were unable to find it and it was concluded that the Soviets had taken it. In July 1985, Vitaly Yurchenko, a KGB colonel who was Pelton's initial contact in Washington, D.C., defected to the United States and provided the information that eventually led to Pelton's arrest.

 As of 1999, the recording device captured by the Soviets was on public display at the Great Patriotic War museum in Moscow (former KGB Headquarters, Lubyanka Prison)."




In the opinion of the author the treacherous and traitorous actions of Ronald Pelton rank equivalent to those of John Anthony Walker, Jr. from the other previously mentioned blog page.

The following images are of Russian origin.




U.S. Navy Saturation Diving Gear Mk 11 Mod 0 and associated equipment, used by personnel in "Ivy Bells" operations deploying the pods and retrieving recorded data. Believe it or not General Electric doesn't just make lightbulbs.





Thursday, April 23, 2020

Unique Aircraft, Unique Perspective - Supermarine Spitfire PR Mk XI PA 944

During the early months of 2014 this author published a blog article on the specific pre-operation photo-reconnaissance mission conducted before Operation Market-Garden which provided critical intelligence regarding the presence of significant elements of the II SS Panzer Corps (9th and 10th Waffen-SS Panzer Divisions) in immediate proximity with the Oosterbeek/Arnhem area. See; http://arnhemjim.blogspot.com/2015/04/an-exercise-in-photo-reconnaissance.html

Unfortunately, as related in that article, this empirical intelligence along with a breath of other intelligence information, including even Enigma traffic, was brazenly dismissed by both Field Marshal Bernard Montgomery, and Lieut-General Frederick ‘Boy’ Browning.

Although not directly related to those precise circumstances, this article relates another rather unique perspective related to the specific type of aircraft employed in conducting that mission. The aircraft being the Supermarine Spitfire PR Mk XI. As will be discussed this plane was adapted by the then U.S. Army Air Force (USAAF), which initially had been flying the Lockheed F-5A. a modified photo-reconnaissance configuration of the P-38 Lightning.

With full acknowledgement and gratitude to SHORTS HD The Short Movie Channel the following video (short film honorable mention award - 2007 SUNDANCE Film Festival ) is presented; ; https://www.youtube.com/embed/ie3SrjLlcUY

For those readers who might want an even more expanded and detailed account, the following rather long video should prove of interest.



Friday, March 13, 2020

British WWII MRC (Medical Research Council) Body Armour


One of the more esoteric and rare pieces of WWII British militaria is a piece of equipment called MRC Body Armour. It is comprised of three pieces of 1mm thick manganese steel (same as used in helmets) plate which are padded with heavy felt pads, each then sewn into a khaki light web/canvas covering, and fastened together by a series of riveted web straps with adjustable brass buckles, and a pair of brass hooks and elongated steel flat loops. The total assembly weighing 3 1/2 pounds.

In April 1942, the Military Research Council gave the go-ahead for standardizing personal protective equipment and beginning their mass production with a forecast of 3.5 million. Eventually, 200,000 sets of Briggs Bodies Motors (major manufacturer of the British Parachutist helmet (HSAT) and Harrison & Bros Howsons were produced by 1944, but only 79,000 were actually used and distributed among the army (3,100 for the Canadian Armed Forces, 6,000 for the paratroopers, for the SAS 400, for the Polish paratroopers 2500 ) And the Royal Air Force.

The author is not certain regarding the specific origin of the example which will be presented in this article. It is either very early British production for the British forces during WWII (See the following image; HQ, 56th Div., 11 Corps, Eastern Command, taken on 21 March 1942), or the known immediate post war production for the Belgian military forces (country or manufacturer unknown).  Two principle indicators are the light green drab hue, compared with a lighter tan khaki of the vast majority of WWII British web equipment, and the fact that someone has seen fit to obscure a marking on the under side of the center plate, for one reason or another. Another indication is that the assembly and stitching of the cloth material in each of the three plates does not seem to come up to the normal quality control expected of either British or Canadian manufacture. While most fittings, including rivets, are brass, there is an exception in that the small plates attaching the webbed straps to each of the three plates, and the two elongated slot fittings, brass riveted to the lower corners of the front center rectangular plate appear to be steel. This detail is consistent with all British production. One thing for certain it is not a replica. The image of a known reproduction by Kay Canvas is shown further below for contrast/comparison.


Unfortunately there is a paucity of surviving examples outside of museums and private collections to compare with. However, given a comparison with all the details of known British manufactured examples, strongly indicates this specimen is also of British manufacture. One of the singular documented use of MRC Body Armour in combat action, is by the British and Polish Airborne Forces during Operation ‘Market - Garden’. There is a specific classic photograph of a group of Polish doctors in battledress, surgical aprons, and MRC body armour, in a forward Field Ambulance Unit aid station. Another unit that was known to have used the armour were members of the Glider Pilot Regiment. One of the main reasons for the rarity of historical photographic evidence, is that the prescribed way of wearing the equipment, is strapped on the inside of an individual’s battledress uniform. The MRC armour was found to be uncomfortable to wear, consequently not widely used. 

The first image to be presented is an example on display, formerly at the Airborne Forces Museum at Altershot, Hants. Note that it is displayed on a Glider Pilot Regiment battledress blouse. 


Another source, in a different view, attributes the same display after having been moved to the Airborne Assault Museum, Duxford.


A different set of MRC body armour on another battledress blouse at the Airborne Assault Museum at Duxford. Note you don't see the 1st glider pilot's brevet on the battledress.


This is followed by the museum's display of another set with a group of distinguished decorations (DSO w/bar, MC, and campaign medals) along with a Denison smock and maroon beret. After protracted observation under magnification the cap badge on the beret can be tentatively identified as Royal Army Medical Corps (brass, correct basic shape, k.c.). With both acknowledgment and gratitude to Ben Hill, ParaData Manager, Airborne Assault Museum, the Denison and MRC armour belonged to a sapper, i.e. (RE, REME), named Denning, and the group of decorations and medals are those of LtCol. Richard T.H. "Dickie" Lonsdale, DSO w/bar, MC, of Lonsdale Force, Oosterbeek, Operation 'Market-Garden'.



Unfortunately the next set of images does not have source attribution other than from an author's personal collection, however comes from a web site with an extensive discussion of the use of MRC body armour by Canadian military forces during WWII.





Following two images are an original and a reconstruction of the MRC body armour as employed by the Canadian Army during WWII.



The next example is an acknowledged  currently produced replica set, clearly marked by the manufacturer Kay Canvas.




The following set of images is from this author's personal collection (found at the Great Western Gun Show in Pomona, Ca. in 1998), clearly showing a discernible difference in the color, as well as a certain wanting in manufacturing quality control. The flatness of all the plates as issued  would indicate a large size (not known whether armour was issued in sizes). This has been corrected as seen in this photography, successfully flexed to the correct curvature.The author would be most appreciative of any reader's further insight regarding the origin of the armour.









The three components, front and back, of the author's example of MRC body armour with the steel plates having been correctly contoured to their intended curvature (no small task if done right). With the plates curved, the armour seems to be rather small in size. This leads one to believe that the obliteration of a marking on the reverse side of the square plate may have been to conceal a small size marking, judging from the length of the straps.







Here are a final two examples, the first apparently being either white or "blancoed", and manufactured for the Belgian army for either a stretcher-bearer, or for use with a winter camouflaged uniform. Said to have been found 20 years ago in a scrapyard un-marked, at that time sold for the equivalent of $351.00 USD, and the other of unknown origin, of a very light grey hue of khaki tan.