Thursday, June 29, 2023

40th Anniversary (now 41st) of British Forces in the Falkland Islands 1982

This blog page portrays a minimalist diorama (vignette) commemorating the 40th Anniversary (now 41st) of 3 Royal Marine Commando Brigade, and B Squadron, Blues and Royals (Royal Horse Guards). Hopefully a future expansion may include 2 and 3 Battalions The Parachute Regiment, and representation of all other units of the British Military Forces engaged in action in the Falkland Islands, April-June 1982.

Included are a couple of images of the desolate, and hostile environment of the theatre of operations. Miserable, an understatement!

The 1:30 scale armoured vehicle depicted is one of four Scorpion FV101(76mm L23A1) which were deployed. They were accompanied by  four Scimitar FV107 (30mm L21 Rarden gun), and additional support vehicles. The figures and the newly released light tank (the actual tank weighed only 8 tons; great speed and trafficability) are produced by Andy Neilson's King and Country Military Miniatures.

In the background of some of the shots can be seen the miniature full band of The Parachute Regiment marching out of their Aldershot depot playing "Don't Cry for Me Argentina". This actually occurred (have the tape). An identical set was presented to Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. Have copy of her thank you note in 1984 to D.J. Cross, the maker. 









What also may be of interest is the accurate corrected historical account of the Royal Marines action at Government House in Stanley at the onset of hostilities on 2 April 1982.

 

The secret battle of the Falklands War you have never heard about; the Real First Battle of Stanley (Argentine Invasion of the Falkland Islands).

By Gayle_Herald  |  Posted: June 14, 2017

By Ricky D Phillips

This is the untold story of a 'secret battle' fought during the Falklands war, according to one military historian.

Author Ricky D Phillips says the Battle of Stanley has been ignored in the history books and is calling for the men who fought in it to receive the recognition they deserve.

On the 35th anniversary of the conflict, he shares his account of what really happened.

On April 2, 1982, 60 Royal Marines of the Naval Party 8901 who constituted the entire garrison for the Falkland Islands were overwhelmed by 80 Argentine Commandos. 

They put up a mere token defence, fired off a few shots, killed one Argentine and wounded a few more and then surrendered.

That's the story you are supposed to know. It is the story that we – the British public – were all told.

It is the story you will find in every book and on every website which deals with the Falklands War. It is a story which has stood for 35 years as 'established history'.

That story, might I say, is rubbish.

For the first time in 35 years, the accounts of the people involved from all three sides; British, Argentine and the Falkland Islanders themselves have been taken, analysed and formed into a new history with fresh interviews and in-depth research into each and every claim or quote, creating a panoramic view of a battle which we’re all told never happened.

The battle of Stanley - for it was a battle, not a mere skirmish – was an action on a par with Rorke's Drift, a battle which, had the world known the truth, might have cost the UK the entire Falklands War.

At 06.05 the battle opened with 84 Argentine Commandos attacking the British position from the rear.

The night sky lit up as Moody Brook barracks, the Marines' accommodation block outside of town was torn apart by gunfire and grenades only for the Argentine Commandos to find their bunks empty and the Royal Marines already deployed.

Moments later, the first Argentine casualties came when a landing craft with 40 men on board sailed through the narrow strip of water into Stanley Harbour and was destroyed, overturned and sunk with an anti-tank rocket, the tightly-packed men being plunged into the freezing, sucking waters from which none came up again.

At Government House, the seat of government in the islands, a special snatch-squad raced into the grounds to seize the governor Rex Hunt, only to run into four waiting Marines who gunned down three of them and left them lying in the garden.

Now others came, rushing in four-abreast and making easy targets for the Royal Marines who, crouched behind a stone wall, picked them off at will.

"The words 'turkey shoot' flashed through my mind," said one of the defenders, Jim Fairfield.

"We took targets of opportunity. There were a lot of targets and I'm a good shot."

At first light, 21 amphibious armoured personnel carriers, each bearing 28 men, landed on the beach around Stanley airport and raced inland like an iron fist ready to smash the pinned-down Royal Marines, but waiting on the outskirts of town was an anti-tank section who fired rockets at the lead vehicle as it came towards them.

Turning to its right, off the road, the giant 'Amtrac' APC seemed to become stuck on the bank of the road as the Royal Marines reloaded and determined to take it out; "I said 'Let's get it!' and I fired and hit it," remembered Royal Marine Stephen 'George' Brown.

"I know exactly where I hit it… there was a flash and then the smoke started to come out as she brewed up."

Marines Reynolds and Gibbs also fired at it with their own weapons from out on the flank.

Gibbs said: "I definitely hit it about three-quarters of the way up and along. It rocked on its suspension and blew a huge great cloud of black smoke and then died."

Coming to its aid were several more Amtracs, the lead one of which was peppered with machine gun fire, taking out the gunner's scopes as the Royal Marines deployed smoke and pulled out just as the Argentine artillery zeroed their position.

Nobody emerged from the destroyed Amtrac.

Back at Government House, the Argentine forces had pulled back to a nearby rocky ridge, waiting for their armour to come to their aid as the Marines now engaged them in a sniping contest, with Geordie Gill, the Royal Marines' top sniper taking out a section leader, a rifleman and a machine gunner as Corporal Terry Pares beside him took out a radio operator.

Marine Graham Evans said: "At one stage we were in the 11-5 club.

"Eleven wounded and five killed as we were hitting them hard up there on the ridge."

Meanwhile, in the streets of Stanley, several sections of Marines fought running battles with the Argentines, vaulting fences, ploughing through gardens and taking down the enemy who seemed to pop up from everywhere.

One Stanley resident, who later found Argentine bodies in her garden, said: "They were fighting like lions to protect us.

"I never knew our Marines could fight so hard."

Finally, with Argentine forces surrounding them by the thousand, the Falklands' governor Rex Hunt agreed to talk to the Argentine commander, Admiral Busser.

He knew that his Marines could – and would - fight to the finish, and so he had to make a decision.

Looking at his officers, Majors Norman and Nott he ordered them to "Tell your men to stop fighting and to lay down their arms".

Later, in an interview with the Plymouth Herald, he said: "I didn't use the word 'surrender' because I knew it wasn't in the Marines' vocabulary."

It had been an epic defence but sadly an inconvenient one.

With the UK needing to look like it was taken by surprise and stomped over by a fascist junta – a necessary story if the world was to be on our side – the men and their story were denied.

Five military medals and 12 mentions in dispatches were recommended and even approved, none were granted.

When the people of the Falklands – knowing the true story – proposed to grant their own medal, the UK government silenced them.

Hoping that a bare minimum report of five enemy killed, 17 wounded, three prisoners and of course the destroyed Amtrac (only what they physically saw and could confirm) would at least be believed, Major Norman put this in his official report.

It was never published.

(Editorial Note: Roy, it sounds a lot more consistent with the defense Lt Keith Mills and his detachment of 22 Royal Marines put up on South Georgia Island. Also consider that the lead attack elements were comprised of the “elite” Buzo Tactico and 2nd Marine Infantry Battalion.)

(An additional significant Editorial Note: At the most recent annual London Toy Soldier Show ( December 2023) Andy Neilson of King and Country Toy Soldiers, displayed a preview of 8 new Falkland British Parachute Regiment figures. They include LtCol "H" Jones, VC, and have been released in January 2024).

 








Wednesday, June 28, 2023

An Addendum to Selected Uniforms of the Gordon Highlanders from 1794-1994

 The following five prints augments the previously uniform plates presented of the Gordon Highlanders from 1794-1994. See; http://arnhemjim.blogspot.com/2017/08/selected-uniforms-of-gordon-highlanders.html .

Thought that this grouping would provide potential additional reference material to military historians and military miniature collectors of that period of history. These specifically focus on the uniforms of the Gordon Highlanders, and their accoutrements, during the colorful Napoleonic and Crimean periods.

















Sunday, March 19, 2023

Sincere Gratitude on the Forthcoming 12th Anniversary of the Arnhem Jim Blog



The 12th Anniversary (28 March) of the Arnhem Jim blog is rapidly approaching. When my oldest son, a retired Commander, and Naval Aviator (helicopters; now with the Indiana National Guard) suggested the idea, I had no idea that a blog focused on such extremely esoteric subject matter would become, and stay, as popular as it has. In addition to keeping me mentally stimulated, it has been both challenging and a tremendous educational experience to have received, researched, and responded to some very unique comments. My most sincere thanks to everyone for your interest and loyal readership.

 

The blog as of this date (19 March 2023) has received 974,875 hits from 204 countries. My goal is to reach a million hits. Given its main content the reader should not be surprised that the United States, United Kingdom, and the Netherlands, predominate in readership. Some of the more unique viewers with multiple hits have come from such countries/territories as Andorra, Aland Islands, Faroe Islands, Burkina Faso, Djibouti, Liechtenstein, Monaco, San Marino, Mayotte, Seychelles, to name but a few. There are currently 102 registered followers of the blog.

 

A relatively recent phenomenon has been to see an initial hit from a single reader with an immediate follow-up series of queries of interest of 25-30 hits. Such is the Internet. There is also a group of extremely loyal readers who have chosen to remain anonymous for well over a decade. They have come from the Central District of  Hong Kong, Cape Town, South Africa, Huizen, Arnhem, and Oosterbeek, the Netherlands (all expected), and Mountain View, CA, Redmond, WA, Phoenix, AZ, to name a few.

 

I was curious to try and learn what subjects and/or specific articles have been the most popular. The one method that came to mind was to scan the entire list of blog articles and find the ones with the highest number of accumulated comments. This is not necessarily the most accurate, as there are orders of battle, lists of toy soldiers, referrals from other forums, that are apparently also of reasonably high interest. However, here is a selection of some that have seen significant popularity based on number of comments. They are listed chronologically by URL for the convenience of the reader who might want to scan some of them:

 

http://arnhemjim.blogspot.com/2011/04/wwii-cutting-edge-night-vision.html

http://arnhemjim.blogspot.com/2011/06/british-cap-badges-additional-guidance.html

http://arnhemjim.blogspot.com/2011/08/wwi-royal-naval-division-cap-badges_28.html

 http://arnhemjim.blogspot.com/2011/09/wwii-parachute-regiment-cap-badge.html

http://arnhemjim.blogspot.com/2011/09/general-aircraft-gal-4950-hamilcar.html

http://arnhemjim.blogspot.com/2011/10/other-webley-limited-standard-semi.html

http://arnhemjim.blogspot.com/2012/01/the-reincarnation-of-calcutta-light.html

http://arnhemjim.blogspot.com/2012/01/war-canoes-of-world-war-ii-cockleshell.html

http://arnhemjim.blogspot.com/2012/05/collection-of-toy-soldiersmilitary.html

http://arnhemjim.blogspot.com/2012/06/hamilcar-gliders-at-operation-market.html

http://arnhemjim.blogspot.com/2012/09/british-1st-airborne-division-vehicle.html

http://arnhemjim.blogspot.com/2012/11/the-airborne-jeeps-of-1st-airborne.html

http://arnhemjim.blogspot.com/2012/10/the-17-pounder-anti-tank-guns-at.html
http://arnhemjim.blogspot.com/2015/07/a-bridge-too-far-movie-casting-mirrors.html

http://arnhemjim.blogspot.com/2016/12/the-6-pounder-anti-tank-guns-at_10.html

http://arnhemjim.blogspot.com/2017/02/a-field-guide-to-regimental-ties.html

http://arnhemjim.blogspot.com/2017/07/detailed-list-of-arms-and-equipment-of.html

https://arnhemjim.blogspot.com/2019/06/greenwood-ball-connoisseur-military.html

https://arnhemjim.blogspot.com/2019/09/wireless-sets-of-1st-airborne-division.html

https://arnhemjim.blogspot.com/2020/01/its-in-cards.html

https://arnhemjim.blogspot.com/2020/10/fox-morigi-or-moriarty-its-all-in-name.html

https://arnhemjim.blogspot.com/2021/10/an-original-unissued-german-wwii_28.html

 

I am most sincerely appreciative of the 101 registered followers of the blog as well as all the other readers over the decade plus that the blog has been published. I fully intend to continue publication, and once again solicit any and all reader recommendations for subjects of interest and/or specific comments/questions.



Slàinte Mhòr! Slàinte! (Gaelic for Great Good Health! Health!)

Arnhem Jim

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sunday, February 5, 2023

Documenting the Origin and Early Evolution of British Airborne Forces Insignia

 Tcrown, a member of the British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum, recently has provided his research on the origin and evolution of British Airborne Forces insignia, in the 1941 -1945 time period. He has encouraged conveying the information to collectors, historians, and all interested parties, with acknowledgement. In addition this blog author thought the information, augmented with added colored imagery of the insignia was worthy of republication. With full acknowledgement and gratitude to Tcrown. To the best of my knowledge all of the images presented herein are genuine and are discussed in detail in various other blog articles previously presented.

A Story of the British Parachute Distinguished Insignia



A few years back, I planned a bit of research on the various patches worn by the parachute battalions during WW2 https://www.britishbadgeforum.com/fo...3&postcount=17


After analyzing a lot of photos mainly from the IWM and Para Data collections, I tried to summarize and share my findings. I don’t pretend to provide an exact story of the evolution of the British Airborne Forces insignias but to offer my contribution to research on this topic. An abundant and very well documented literature exists already on British Airborne uniforms but somehow these books lack details about the chronology of the various patches. I’ve tried to fill the blanks with a special focus on the Parachute units.

This first post will cover the 1940 to 1942 period up until the creation of the Parachute Regiment.

1- Initial Regulations in the British Army

ACI 419 issued in May 1940 stated that Divisional Signs or badges will not be worn by British divisions during the war. This coincided with the introduction of Battle-Dress which was to provide an utilitarian uniform with no particular means to identify arms of service.
General Gort, Commander in Chief of the British Expeditionary Force at the time disapproved the decision and objected that Esprit de Corps, particularly in the Infantry would suffer if soldiers in Battle-Dress were not allowed to wear an emblem showing the regiment to which they belong.

ACI 1118 published on 18 September 1940 finally approved certain distinguished marks. For the early parachute troops, this translated into the introduction and approval of a special badge for wear by qualified parachutists through ACI 1589 dated 28 December 1940. As for Regimental flashes or other formation signs, there were none for the only parachute unit at the time – the 11th SAS.

Members of the 11st SAS photographed in Feb 1941
(source IWM)
[/SIZE]


2- Introduction of Additional Formation Badges

ACI 2587 dated 27 December 1941 set out formation patches as well as arm-of-service strips, rank badge backing and regimental badges to be worn at the top of both sleeves of the Battle-Dress blouse.
The Army Air Corps had just been formed on 21 Dec 1941 with the intend of overseeing all airborne forces that were under (glider, parachute and air landing activities).

Around the end of 1941, a group of airborne officers led by Gen “Boy” Browning formed the “Dungeon Party”, so named as they were located in the basement of GHQ Home Forces in Storeys Gate London, to create British airborne forces. Gen Browning was acutely aware that the then fledgling airborne forces needed a powerful, unifying symbol, taking advantage of the fact that formation patches had just been authorized to be worn on Battle-Dress. The myth of Bellerophon astride Pegasus was chosen as the symbol of airborne forces. The design of the now famous Pegasus flash was commissioned by General Browning to Major Edward Seago, a reputable artist.


The “Dungeon Party” ca mid 1942. Lt Col JA Goshen
 can be seen on the far right front row.
 He was the G4 logistics staff officer under
 Gen Browning (source ParaData)

It is believed that the Airborne signs (both curved and strip) were designed at the same time as the Pegasus patch and started to be issued in the course of 1942.

An interesting photo taken immediately after the return of the raid party to Bruneval aboard Prins Albert, shows that both printed Pegasus and Airborne strip had already started to be issued in early 1942.


Lt Col John Goshen, G4 of Airborne Forces Staff,
 with Major Frost aboard Prins Albert
 in Portsmouth on Feb 28th 1942 (source IWM)

3 – The Use of Airborne Signs in the Early Days

So far, Airborne forces haven’t been formed into Regiments: Parachutes forces grouped in battalions and their members were still wearing the cap badge of their original regiments which didn’t provide a sense of unity. Having no regimental designation yet established, it is believed that the curved airborne sign was used as a shoulder title for providing a mean of identification on top of the parachute wings. This was also the case for the glider pilots until the creation of the Glider Pilot Regiment with effect from 24th Feb 1942. However, photos of members of the GPR exist indicating that the Airborne strip was worn in 1943 (source IWM H28694 & H28695). 

The situation was much different for the glider or airlanding troops as they had been transferred or converted into airborne forces by formed regiments with their own designation. They already had their shoulder titles, although unofficial. So, for these airborne troops who were not parachutists, the Airborne strip was introduced in early 1942 which was to be worn below the Pegasus patches. The Airborne strip would later be officially authorized by ACI 2816 on 31 Oct 1942.

Printed Airborne shoulder titles issued to Parachute
 forces and to Glider pilots in 1942 (source IWM)

It seems that Airborne shoulder titles had been issued at the same period to qualified and active parachutists as we can see in the following photographs. ACI 2587 of 27 Dec 1941 didn’t authorize regimental designations except for the Household Cavalry and the Foot Guards. The designation ‘Airborne’ was added to the exceptions for the members of the Airborne troops.

Inspection by HM the King of 3rd Parachute Battalion

 on Mar 25, 1942 (source IWM)

 

Inspection by HM the King of members of the 5th
 (Scottish) Parachute Battalion at the time in formation,
 with Brigadier Flavel and Maj Gen Browning
 on May 21, 1942 at Bulford (source IWM)

  

4 – The Creation of the Parachute Regiment

Special Army order 128 dated on 31 August 1942 detailed the formation of the Glider Pilot Regiment with effect from 24th Feb 1942 and the Parachute Regiment with effect from 1st Aug 1942. With a Regimental designation, unofficial shoulder titles would start replacing gradually the ‘Airborne’ titles with ‘Parachute’ titles.

Unissued grouping from Pte Charles Myatt who joined
1 Bat T Coy in Aug/Sept 1942. Note the non conforming
 private purchase Pegasus patch as well as standard
 trimmed Para wings (source Paradata)

Many members of the Parachute forces continued to wear the Airborne shoulder titles and the conversion to ‘Parachute’ shoulder titles remained somewhat limited in 1942. The 1st Parachute Brigade was soon deployed to North Africa in November and at the time the wearing of distinctive formation badges on Battle-Dress was strictly prohibited while in campaign overseas.

Lt Col JD Frost receiving DSO from General Anderso
 on 15 Jan 1943 near Souk el Khemis (source IWM) 

Members of 1st Para Brigade at Algiers Nov 1942
 showing no distinctive insignias as per regulations
 (Source IWM NA87)

2nd Brigade which was still in formation in the UK in early 1943 was inspected by HM the King on April 2 in Bulford, just before being deployed to North Africa later in the month.
All members of the three battalions were wearing the ‘Airborne’ shoulder titles as evidenced in the following photos.

4th Para Battalion inspected on 2 Apr 1943 by HM
the Kingalong with Lt Col Dene & Brigadier Down
 (source IWM H28678). Note the blackened webbing,
 something specific to the 4th Battalion.

5th (Scottish) Para Battalion inspected on 2 Apr 1943
 by HM the King along with Brigadiers Down & Hotchinson
 (source IWM H28674)


Lt Col Pritchard presenting 6th (Welsh) Para Bat
 to HM the King on 2 Apr 1943 (source IWM H28681)


5 - The Official Regimental Designation

With ACI 905 dated 12 June 1943, the text of Regimental designations was officially approved, and shoulder titles would be formally authorized. The text ’Parachute Regiment’ became the official designation of the Regiment. The Army instruction also defined the colours of background and lettering of the Regimental shoulder titles as respectively Cambridge blue and dark blue, colours that would be common for all formations belonging to the Army Air Corps.

The new blue ‘Parachute Regiment’ titles were issued to the Brigades that were in the UK about to form the 6th Airborne division (3rd and 5th Brigades).

Most of the members of both Para Brigades in the 6th Airborne Division not only worn the blue Parachute shoulder titles but also the Airborne strips which became no longer a unique attribute of non parachutists within Airborne forces. 

A group of soldiers from the 7th Parachute Battalion
 ca 1944 (source Para Data)

Some of the few who adopted the unofficial Parachute title in late 1942/early 1943 converted to the official Parachute Regiment titles and Airborne strips as we can see below:


Two photos of Pvt Ron Tucker from 9th (Essex) Battalion
 (3rd Brigade). The battalion was formed in Dec 1942
 and Pvt Tucker worn the unofficial maroon Parachute
 title for a while before adopting the official Regimental
 title probably in the second half of 1943
 (source batterie-merville.com)

Lt Col Pine-Coffin on 2 Oct 1942
shortly after being appointed CO of 3rd Battalion
 (source IWM)

Lt Col Pine-Coffin on 19 May 1944,
 inspecting 7th Battalion as CO
 (source IWM H38604)








We are further indebted to Crown for his research on the origin and development. of the British Parachutist brevet. With acknowledgement and gratitude his article follows:

Early Para Wings


It is well accepted by collectors that the early parachute wings were manufactured by Lewis Falk Limited. A true characteristic of early wings is split or detached feathers.

The first wings were issued in Jan 1941 after ACI 1589 dated 28/12/1940 was published describing the badge itself and the qualifying conditions.
From the photos available in the IWM collection, we can get an idea about the way these badges were worn at the very beginning.



These two photos were taken in early January 1941 during a parachute demonstration before General Brooke (C in C Home Forces). Lt Col Ivor Jackson, CO of 11th SAS (the only British parachute force at the time) is pictured wearing his Para badge uncut in its full rectangular original form (I’m wondering who the officer, likely his 2nd in C, was standing next to him). Note also the parachutists in the background emplaning with their gear and newly issued smocks. They don’t wear any wings as the badge was at the time only permitted on BD. This was changed on 12 Feb 1941 (ACI 204) when wearing para badges was authorized on smocks (called officially ‘gabardine jump jacket’).



This photo (source: ParaData) shows members of C troop 11th SAS wearing badges on their smock. Interestingly, the second individual from the left first row (Cpl A. Phillips) was tragically killed in a parachute accident on 16 Feb 1941. We can just assume that all parachute members were eager to wear their badge once permitted.



A photo of the recent issued badge was taken on 21 Feb 1941 (IWM) with its typical rectangular form. The split of feathers is clearly visible on both period and modern photos.

It looks like the practice of wearing the badge in an uncut form was shortly discontinued on BD as can be seen in this snapshot of a movie taken in Feb 1941 (source: IWM ‘The Service Takes to Silk’).


Lt Col Jackson himself wore trimmed wings when he presented his unit to the King in May 1941. 
 
These type of wings although issued first, continued to be worn well beyond late war years. They are not particularly rare and the collector has to be aware that uncut (unissued) or oval shape wings don’t make them any earlier than they are.
I have added a couple of photos of trimmed examples of the same wing type that could have been issued during mid or even late war.





In conclusion, these wings were widely distributed during the war and don’t have to be confused with the early and brief practice of wearing uncut badges.


The following is an excellent example of an early Indian Parachutist Brevet.




For individual readers who may be interested in obtaining more extensive references on the subject, and may not be aware of the following two tomes (although a bit expensive). Each provide comprehensive color photography of original insignis with equally excellent narrative, and are well worth the investment.


British Airborne Insignia, Lock. Oliver, Miliary Mode Publishing, Hitchin, Hertfordshire SG5 3FE, 2015, ISBN: 1634524047 ISBN 13: 9781634524049.



British Airborne Insignia Vol.
2, Lock. Oliver, Miliary Mode Publishing, Hitchin, Hertfordshire SG5 3FE, 2017, ISBN: 1513622498 ISBN 13: 97815113622491.