Having written the previous article on the arms and equipment of a World War II British Airborne Division, this author reviewed the orders of battle for those divisions available on the Internet. There are some very good ones, and I have listed one of the best in the Links section of this blog, however it seemed as though all of them lacked certain elements of information.
Early in my evolving interest in the British 1st Airborne Division at the battle of Arnhem I compiled an expanded and annotated Order of Battle (OOB)/Table of Basic Allowances (T B/A) of the Division. Given my then very limited knowledge of the battle, I submitted my preliminary efforts to the staff of the Airborne Forces Museum, which was co-located with their Headquarters and Depot, Aldershot, Hampshire. It's reasonably comprehensive, and although far from perfect, it does incorporate some features not found elsewhere. Where there are identified errors or incompleteness, hopefully they have been identified.
Early in my evolving interest in the British 1st Airborne Division at the battle of Arnhem I compiled an expanded and annotated Order of Battle (OOB)/Table of Basic Allowances (T B/A) of the Division. Given my then very limited knowledge of the battle, I submitted my preliminary efforts to the staff of the Airborne Forces Museum, which was co-located with their Headquarters and Depot, Aldershot, Hampshire. It's reasonably comprehensive, and although far from perfect, it does incorporate some features not found elsewhere. Where there are identified errors or incompleteness, hopefully they have been identified.
It was 1974 and the epic
film adaptation of Cornelius Ryan’s book “A Bridge Too Far” was yet to be
produced, however the book had become a best seller. Maj Geoff G. Norton, the
then curator of the museum, was gracious enough to personally respond to my
request to review and correct my efforts to that point in time. I think that
because the query was coming from a “colonial”, and a reserve naval
intelligence officer of senior rank, must have captured his interest and attention. At the
time he was a busy man, also serving as Second-in-Command of the Depot of the
Parachute Regiment and Airborne Forces. In addition, he himself had already authored a book
in the “Famous Regiments” series, “The
Red Devils”, in 1971. See; Norton, G.G., The Red Devils (The Story of British Airborne Forces), Leo Cooper Ltd, London, 1971, ISBN 0 85052 045 2. Given his detailed knowledge and encouragement, I
continued to expand and refine my efforts.
As already pointed out in
the immediately previous blog article, http://arnhemjim.blogspot.com/2017/07/detailed-list-of-arms-and-equipment-of.html, there is a disparity with regard to quantities of
items in allowance as given in Lt Col H.F. Joslen’s book, Orders of Battle,
Second World War,1939 -1945, Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, 1960. When
compiling the list of arms and equipment I was not aware of Lt Col Joslen’s
book. Nor do I know whether Maj Norton had access to the book. In his
correspondence Maj Norton cites as his source British Army Staff Tables (1944)
for an Airborne Division’s weapons. Two of the principal differences in the two lists
is in the increase of anti-tank weapons (6 pdrs and PIATs) and jeeps. Given the
significantly improved capabilities of German armor late in the war, combined
with the combat established need to improve ground mobility for the paratroops, the author would give
more credence to the higher numbers. The author personally concludes that the
higher numbers are more likely to be correct. An attempt to
reconcile all the discrepancies has been attempted, and is included in addition to the original analysis developed
in 1974.
Keen eyes will also discern the
author’s limited knowledge at the time, such as the
erroneous inclusion of the Inglis Browning 9mm pistol and Wireless Set, No. 38 in
the equipment list, the omission of the Morris artillery tractors for the 17 pdr anti-tank
guns, and the lack of personnel numbers for the 6080 and 6341 Light Warning Units of
the RAF (at least I was aware of their existence). Suffices the author has learned quite a
bit since those early efforts, and hopefully that knowledge has been conveyed in this and
other articles contained in this blog.
erroneous inclusion of the Inglis Browning 9mm pistol and Wireless Set, No. 38 in
the equipment list, the omission of the Morris artillery tractors for the 17 pdr anti-tank
guns, and the lack of personnel numbers for the 6080 and 6341 Light Warning Units of
the RAF (at least I was aware of their existence). Suffices the author has learned quite a
bit since those early efforts, and hopefully that knowledge has been conveyed in this and
other articles contained in this blog.
To the best of my knowledge all the other
names and numbers are correct to the extent of known official archives. Having diligently attempted to edit the tables for alignment of the columns, if there are any remaining ambiguities, please advise the author in the Comments.
Editorial note: Although previously unknown to the author the following piece of equipment which should be added, and was flown in by Horsa glider and employed by the Royal Engineers in Operation Market Garden was an American Machine and Metals, Inc., Tractor, Crawler, Gasoline, Clark CA-1 bulldozer.
Editorial note: Although previously unknown to the author the following piece of equipment which should be added, and was flown in by Horsa glider and employed by the Royal Engineers in Operation Market Garden was an American Machine and Metals, Inc., Tractor, Crawler, Gasoline, Clark CA-1 bulldozer.
6 comments:
Hi Jim
Were most British platoons at Arnhem at strength or under-strength? Doing a bit of wargaming with 28m figures so I was just wondering.
Hello Smith,
You pose a very challenging question as to whether the combat platoons in the British 1st Airborne Division in Operation Market-Garden (Battle of Arnhem/Oosterbeek) were at or under strength. Right up front let me answer, I don’t specifically know.
Having said that, the percentage of 84.2 obtained from dividing the divisional allowance of 12,215 all ranks by 10,231 (number engaged at Arnhem) is rather high. You also have to consider a fair number of logistics support personnel who were in the division’s logistical “tail”. I don’t immediately have that number at hand, but it certainly improves the tooth-to-tail ratio.
Given this back of the envelope analysis, I would have to say that the platoons within the parachute battalions, the airlanding battalions, and the glider pilot squadrons, were at strength. Hope that is of some assistance.
Best regards and stay safe,
Arnhem Jim
Hi Jim. Congratulations on the information you've assembled here. I'm confused about motorcycles. The TOE lists motorcyle, solo and motorcycle lightweight. Do you know which of these classifications refer to the BSA WM20 Solo motorcycle, the Royal Enfield WD/RE, or the Wellbike? I know the Wellbike was dropped in panniers and the "Flying Flea" could be dropped by parachute. But was it the Flea or the BSA that went into the gliders? Or both?
Kind regards,
PaulW.
Hello Paul W,
Having dutifully researched my reply, I apparently sent it off into the ether. Here goes again.
Primary reference for information is; D-Day Paratroopers, Jean Bouchery, ISBN: 2915239-31-2.
He cites the following motorcycles employed by the British Airborne Forces (at least as of D-Day);
Motorcycle, Ariel, Model W MG, solo, Heavyweight (170 kg)
Motorcycle, Triumph, Model 3SW solo, Heavyweight (150 kg)
Motorcycle, Lightweight, Royal Enfield WD RE (65 kg)
Motorcycle, James ML (63.96 kg)
Motorcycle, Lightweight, Welbike (38 kg)
He apparently omitted the BSA 20M solo (167kg), but from the Internet web site (https://cybermotorcycle.com/marques/bsa/bsa-m20.htm), As you probably know it was widely employed over a record span of years by British military forces. Welbike or “Flying Flea I don’t have an answer, but lacking definitive information, would surmise both.
Sincerely appreciate your interest in the blog, and hopefully this has been of some assistance.
Best regards and Slà inte Mhòr!
Jim Gordon aka Arnhem Jim
Thanks Jim. You've certainly been of assistance. It looks to me like the paratroops mostly used the lightweight versions for communcation within their battalions, while the heavier 'solo' versions went with the air landing units. For example, the jeeps towing 6 pounder A/T guns were loaded with ammunition because the gun was too long to include a trailer in the glider. Since everyone in the gun sections couldn't fit in the tow jeeps, one gun number had to ride alongside on a motorcycle. You wouldn't want to be trying to keep up with your fellow bombardiers in the jeep, riding a Wellbike or a Flea. ;)
P.S. I received my copy of Rob van Meel's 'British Airborne Jeeps' today. Thumbing through it, I noticed a picture which included a Matchless WD-G3L 350 cc. So you can add that one to the list as well.
Post a Comment